Immigration ad inflames Internet users By Mike Langberg San Jose Mercury News In perhaps the biggest violation yet of "netiquette," the unofficial code of conduct for the Internet global computer network, a Phoenix immigration law firm sent out an unsolicited advertisement this week to 5,000 user groups and got back at least 30,000 angry responses. That five-alarm outbreak of "flame mail," Internet slang for nasty electronic messages, repeatedly crashed the computers at Internet Direct, a small Phoenix on-line service used by the husband-and-wife firm of Canter & Siegel. The possibility of ads creeping onto the Internet, not the politically touchy issue of immigration, caused the furor -- raising again the nagging question of commercial use on the unsupervised network of networks that connects an estimated 20 million users worldwide. Formed 20 years ago by the Defense Department to link academic researchers and government agencies, the Internet has grown to the point where a majority of users are outside the walls of a university or federal office. Although the Internet in theory is not intended for commercial use, many types of commerce are now widely accepted; companies setting up a data-base where customers can retrieve product information, for example, or executives exchanging business messages. Sending out unsolicited advertising such as Canter & Siegel's pitch, however, is still beyond the pale, although there are no binding regulations preventing such conduct. "This shows a wanton disregard for what people have established as acceptable use," said Brent Helsop, a Mountain View technical writer who has co-authored "The Instant Internet Guide" and two related books. "It's like attacking the president. You just can't do that." Internet Direct immediately suspended Canter & Siegel's account for violating the customer service agreement. The lawyers came back with a threat to sue for $250,000 to recover the small number of messages from people interested in their offer. "There's nothing illegal about what we did," insisted Laurence Canter on Wednesday. "We did something new," added Martha Siegel. "We understand when you do something new, it's controversial. But just because it's controversial doesn't mean it's wrong." This isn't the first time, however, that Canter and Siegal got into trouble for committing the Internet equivalent of sending out junk mail. Siegel said Netcom Online Communication Services Inc., a San Jose provider of Internet access, told the couple to stop sending out multiple postings last month. Canter & Siegel sent their latest ad Monday night to just about every Internet "news group," electronic bulletin boards on specific subjects ranging from computer programming to child care. Many of these news groups have internal policies banning unsolicited advertising and many news-group subscribers pay for each message received. Specifically, the law firm offered free information on an upcoming federal lottery that will award 55,000 "green cards" extending permanent residency status to immigrants. "There is a strict June deadline. The time to start is now!!," the ad said. Users requesting the free information will receive a six-page brochure describing the lottery and declaring: "The truth is an attorney can help increase your odds of winning. The law firm of Canter & Siegel is your best lottery choice." Internet Direct, a year-old start-up with only five employees, posted an apology in a few news groups Tuesday, saying the service did not condone the law firm's action. "They knew what they were doing was not acceptable," said Jeff Wheelhouse, Internet Direct's system administrator. But Siegel said her firm sought permission and provided a memo from Internet Direct business manager Bill Fisher, dated March 22, stating: "We do not pre-censor information. We will not stop you from doing anything unless we believe it to be illegal. If we receive reports that actions you are performing are having deleterious effects upon our systems and the other users of Internet Direct, then we will ask you to cease."